Plans to introduce a new digital hub offering free Wi-Fi outside Molineux Stadium have been rejected by the local council.
The proposed project would have transformed an existing phone box near the home of Wolverhampton Wanderers, but officials deemed the design too prominent for the surrounding area.
City of Wolverhampton Council rejects digital hub outside Molineux
BT had applied to convert a phone kiosk at the end of Staveley Road into a new Street Hub featuring two 75-inch digital advertising screens.
The structure would also have provided free public Wi-Fi, internet access and an interactive tablet, while two other nearby phone kiosks would have been removed as part of the scheme to improve pedestrian access.
However, as per the BBC, the City of Wolverhampton Council rejected the application after concluding that the proposed hub would be visually prominent and fail to fit satisfactorily within its surroundings.
:quality(65)/https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.footballgroundguide.com%2Fmain%2F2026%2F07%2Fimago1073746955-2.jpg)
Planning officials said the structure would create unnecessary visual clutter in an area where existing signage follows a more disciplined and proportionate approach.
BT had argued that the project would support wider efforts to improve digital connectivity, while the council would also have received free advertising space on the screens to display public information.
The company also pointed towards two similar schemes previously rejected by the council but later approved on appeal after planning inspectors ruled that their benefits outweighed the drawbacks.
FGG says: Free Wi-Fi near Molineux would have been a useful matchday addition
It is a shame that supporters will miss out on improved free Wi-Fi access close to Molineux, particularly when mobile connectivity can often struggle around busy football stadiums on matchdays.
The council clearly has concerns about the visual impact of the proposed hub, but better digital access around major grounds is becoming increasingly useful for supporters.
Perhaps a less intrusive design could eventually provide the same benefits without creating the visual clutter that led to this proposal being rejected.