Local councillor who cast only vote against City Ground expansion plans breaks silence on decision

Nottingham Forest’s plans to redevelop the City Ground have been given the green light, but one councillor remains concerned about its potential impact on the surrounding area.

Sue Mallender was the only member of Rushcliffe Borough Council’s planning committee to vote against the proposals.

Why one councillor opposed Nottingham Forest's stadium redevelopment plans

The Rushcliffe Borough Council planning committee granted conditional permission for Forest to extend the Peter Taylor Stand and fill in both corners of the Trent End, taking the City Ground’s capacity to around 45,000.

Outline permission was also granted for the future extension of the Brian Clough Stand, which would eventually take the stadium beyond 52,000 seats.

Mallender, who represents Lady Bay, said she remains concerned about the impact of thousands of additional supporters on nearby residential streets.

Illegal parking has been a recurring issue around the City Ground, with Forest proposing to fund a Controlled Parking Zone to restrict parking during matches.

The Green Party councillor said she supports the design and recognised the jobs and wider benefits the project could bring, but believes key measures should be in place before the redevelopment progresses.

Speaking to local press, she also raised concerns about traffic and pedestrian access, particularly after proposals to permanently close two lanes on Trent Bridge on matchdays were rejected.

Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council have instead suggested Forest contribute towards a new bridge over the River Trent, although Mallender believes there is still insufficient detail around that proposal.

Despite her opposition, Mallender said she hopes the redevelopment ultimately encourages young people to become involved in football.

She also acknowledged that some supporters had directed offensive comments towards her following the vote, arguing that local residents affected by the plans should have their concerns heard.

Forest first announced plans to expand the City Ground in 2019, with the club having previously considered relocating before committing to its historic home.

FGG says: City Ground expansion must balance ambition with local concerns

It is understandable that Forest supporters are celebrating after such a long-running process, but Mallender’s concerns should not simply be dismissed because she was the only councillor to vote against the plans.

A stadium of this scale will inevitably have an impact on the surrounding area, particularly on matchdays, so getting parking, transport and access arrangements right will be important.

Forest now have the opportunity to deliver the redevelopment while ensuring the local community benefits too.