Stadium redevelopment in the English Premier League has become so popular that no club wants to be left behind in the mad rush for more fans and even more money. While some football fans believe it serves only aesthetic purposes, the ongoing stadium regeneration projects in the UK and across Europe cost billions of pounds.
For example, soon after the 2026/17 season, Tottenham Hotspur demolished the 36,000-capacity White Hart Lane to construct a £1 billion ultra-modern venue. Tottenham's move to a new venue was as necessary as it was urgent, especially with Spurs' growing fan base overstretching the available amenities at the old stadium.
Chelsea, Arsenal and Manchester United are some of the big Premier League clubs currently considering redeveloping Stamford Bridge, Emirates Stadium and Old Trafford respectively.
This post explores the growing popularity of stadium redevelopment in EPL, especially its financial impact, cost and other reasons.
The financial impact of stadium upgrades
Contents
The financial impact of stadium redevelopment is undoubtedly huge and sometimes, a recipe for potential losses. It all boils down to meticulous planning and execution of the whole undertaking. But considering the huge popularity of the English Premier League, clubs have hardly made any losses from such bold moves. Let's look at some instances.
Tottenham Hotspur Stadium has had a massive financial impact on the club and the economy, especially in London. An increase in seating capacity by at least 26,000 means Tottenham have since doubled revenue collection from match ticket sales alone.
Consulting firm EY reports that the Tottenham Hotspur stadium pumps at least £900 million into London's economy. It has also created thousands of jobs for locals, projected to hit about 3,700 new employment opportunities by the 2026/27 season.
The new Tottenham Hotspur Stadium has also been hosting sold-out music concerts featuring popular artists such as Beyonce. With that, the stadium generates revenue for both the club and the city through various means. This impact also extends to the hospitality industry.
Recently, the local council approved a proposal by the club to build a 30-storey hotel near the stadium, which will further increase the club's financial benefits.
This is also true for other EPL clubs that have embarked on audacious stadium regeneration projects as they aim to use their new stadiums for other purposes other than football.
The expansion of Liverpool Stadium was a significant project, especially in terms of its financial impact. Since increasing its capacity from 45,000 to 61,000 by redeveloping some of the stands, Liverpool FC has seen significant financial growth. This expansion has not only created more jobs but has also generated additional revenue for the club.
A regeneration plan for Old Trafford will create at least 92,000 jobs, build 17,000 new homes, and inject at least £7.3 billion into the UK economy each year, according to BBC and other UK news sources.
The first look at Manchester United's new stadium 👀
Plans were revealed for INEOS' regeneration project 🏗️🏟️ pic.twitter.com/atEIJM9G0L
— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) September 25, 2024
Challenges and Costs of Redeveloping Stadiums
One of the biggest challenges in stadium redevelopment is the cost associated with it. Investors and even the government are sometimes compelled to abandon a stadium regeneration project due to rising expenses. Casement Park in Scotland isn't part of the EPL venues but serves as a great example of just how untenable project costs can run down a project.
The case with Everton's stadium redevelopment plans is no different. Current owner Farhad Moshiri has agreed to sell his majority stake at the club to American investor, Dan Friedkin.
The sale, reportedly valued at approximately £400 million, has been prompted by the urgent necessity to relocate to Everton's new stadium at the Mersey Riverfront. The Toffees are expected to begin playing in their new stadium at the start of the 2025/26 season.
During a match against Arsenal earlier in the 2024/25 season at Old Trafford, footage showed leaking roofs, leaving the club management embarrassed. It sparked renewed discussion about the need for a new stadium or the complete redevelopment of the Theatre of Dreams.
Redeveloping the Theatre of Dreams will require between £1 billion and £2 billion to increase its capacity to 10,000 seats. Initially, reports suggested that the government would contribute to this project due to its importance to the UK economy. However, the Mayor of Greater Manchester recently refuted these claims in an interview, stating that no public money will be allocated for the redevelopment of Old Trafford.
Land acquisition and approval for Premier League Stadium redevelopment are the other challenges that some clubs have faced. It is often a long tedious process that can take years. Recognizing that such projects often disrupt the lives of residents in stadium neighbourhoods, significant planning and discussions with the local community are essential to the process.
Comparing New Builds vs. Stadium Redevelopments
The expansion of football stadiums is primarily focused on increasing seating capacity and generating more revenue. However, challenges in expanding existing structures, such as limited space, have led some Premier League clubs, like Everton, to consider building new venues instead of demolishing the current ones. This raises the question: which option is better—constructing a new stadium or expanding an existing one?
Comparing new builds vs stadium redevelopment mostly boils down to the cost. In the case of Old Trafford, cost comparison between the two options has been a subject of huge debate, noting that the cost variation between the two isn't much in terms of the proposed investment.
As a result, Manchester United have opted for a brand-new stadium. Even more noteworthy is the failing Old Trafford infrastructure, so fans reportedly want a brand-new stadium.
Liverpool only expanded Anfield's seating capacity by redeveloping some of the stands for several reasons. First, the club did not have the £400 million needed for a new stadium. Secondly, the existing infrastructure was able to accommodate the expanded capacity.
The other difference is the stadium appeal. Ultra-modern stadiums, like the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, which operates on 100% green energy, are more aesthetically appealing than the previous White Hart Lane. However, Tottenham ensured they maintained their identity by preserving the iconic cockerel in the new stadium. We are likely to see a similar approach taken with the popular murals at Old Trafford when the club moves forward with plans to construct a new venue.
Does it always work out for the best
In many ways, the redevelopment of Premier League stadiums is beneficial. It creates job opportunities for local communities and boosts the economy of these clubs. The narrative surrounding it has consistently been positive.
We have observed that new venues often become the loudest stadiums in the Premier League due to their increased capacity. With a rise in average attendance, there is also a greater demand for stadium stewards. For instance, Everton is hiring over 500 stewards to ensure smoother operations at the larger Bramley-Moore Dock. The new Everton Stadium will have more than 15,000 on top of the 39,000-seat capacity of Goodison Park.
Other instances, such as Liverpool's inability to build a new stadium, left fans feeling disheartened. Anfield is an iconic venue with a rich identity and history. However, without any expansion plans on the horizon, Liverpool fans are increasingly feeling disadvantaged in the race for stadium redevelopment within the Premier League.
Smaller stadiums lead to fewer fans attending matches, resulting in lower income for the club. Manchester United is already a financial powerhouse, so building a new stadium with a capacity of 100,000 seats would make them nearly unbeatable in ticket sales. However, there is a significant risk of losing iconic names like “The Theatre of Dreams” or popular ones like “Goodison Park,” which fans have identified with for generations.