Chelsea are continuing discussions over a potential move to Earls Court, with the west London site emerging as their preferred option for a new stadium.
However, a disagreement over the amount of land to acquire and negotiations with the development group remain major obstacles to the ambitious project.
Chelsea discussions over Earls Court site takes fresh twist
Chelsea are understood to have held ‘serious talks' with the Earls Court Development Group (ECDG) throughout the summer as they explore the possibility of building a new stadium away from Stamford Bridge.
According to insider Simon Phillips, former co-owner Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital eventually agreed that Earls Court would be the preferred destination, although they differed over how much land to purchase.
Boehly reportedly favoured acquiring the entire site to create a wider entertainment development with some housing, while Clearlake has preferred buying 20 acres for a stadium-led project.
The ECDG had previously been reluctant to discuss a potential sale before securing planning consent, which it obtained around 15 to 18 months ago. However, the group has reportedly struggled to secure commercial funding for its wider development.
/https%3A%2F%2Fmedia.footballgroundguide.com%2Fmain%2F2026%2F02%2Fimago1051689162.jpg)
The development group is understood to be more interested in selling the entire site, although a deal has not been ruled out if the financial terms are suitable.
Local authorities are reportedly supportive of Chelsea's potential move, provided the project includes a combined sports and entertainment development alongside residential facilities.
Chelsea have yet to raise the matter with the Chelsea Pitch Owners, with the club reportedly believing it would be premature to do so before reaching a definitive agreement.
The negotiations remain ongoing, with no guarantee that a deal will be reached.
FGG says: Chelsea’s Earls Court stadium ambitions face a defining hurdle
Earls Court remains a significant possibility for Chelsea, with discussions continuing over a site that could offer scope for a new stadium and wider development.
However, the difference over how much land to acquire and the need to reach an agreement with ECDG mean the project is far from secured.
The lack of a definitive deal also leaves the club's alternative of redeveloping Stamford Bridge in the picture, with the future of Chelsea's stadium plans still uncertain.